Tag Archives: mohammed

Robert Spencer – La vérité sur mohamed – La religion la plus intolérante au monde


L’Islam fondamentaliste dit puiser ses racines dans le Coran, on pourrait en déduire que le livre sacré lui-même détient des directives irréconciliables avec les valeurs démocratiques, le premier amendement de la constitution (américaine), l’égalité des sexes, et le système judiciaire. Êtes-vous d’accord ?
SPENCER : Bien entendu. Au travers de l’histoire de l’islam, il est déduit par une grande majorité de commentateurs orthodoxe et théologiens ainsi que par les écoles de jurisprudence islamique qui forment diverses sectes, que l’Islam nourrit des directives irréconciliables avec les valeurs démocratiques, l’égalité des droits homme-femme, et le système judiciaire.
SUITE: http://www.drzz.info/article-23098640…
—————————————-­­—————————
Les lieux”saints” de l’islam – Publié le 06/07/2007 par mahomet

Dès les VIIème-VIIIème siècles, Jean Damascène qualifiait l’islam de secte.

Effectivement, l’islam fut une secte (qui reprit le canon judéo-chrétien en le détournant dans un sens plus violent et plus partisan), et Mahomet fut son gourou. Avant tout, un gourou doit se faire obéir: « Obéissez à Allah, obéissez au Messager, et prenez garde! Si ensuite vous vous détournez… alors sachez qu’il n’incombe à Notre messager que de transmettre le message clairement. » (5:92)

Et moi qui croyais que le Messager n’était qu’un simple “annonceur”, un homme comme les autres… Il peut avoir des relations sexuelles avec toute femme de la secte.

Allah dit à Mahomet : ” O prophète ! Il t’es permis d’épouser les femmes que tu auras dotées, les captives qu’Allah aura fait tomber entre tes mains, les filles de tes oncles et de tes tantes maternels et paternels qui ont pris la fuite avec toi, et toute femme fidèle qui aura donné son âme au prophète. C’est une prérogative que nous t’accordons sur les autres croyants. ” (Sourate 30/49-51)

Ce privilège unique qu’a Mahomet, lui qui aime beaucoup les femmes comme il le dit dans un hadith, lui qui avait un appétit sexuel unique, il en profitera bien.

Il épousera Zaynab, la femme de son fils (ce qui est interdit aux autres hommes), grâce à une recommandation d’Allah.

Il épousera Aïcha, 9 ans.

Comme l’écrit Tabari : “Malgré le fait qu’Aïcha fut la fiancée de quelqu’un d’autre, et que son père Abou Bakr s’opposait à son alliance avec le Prophète, celui-ci convainquit tout le monde et fit son alliance avec Aïcha. Elle fut donc fiancée à 6 ans et mariée à 9 ans.”

Pour le reste, la vie de Mahomet fut très agréable. Il est au milieu de ses disciples, et au moment opportun, arrive la communication d’Allah.

“O Envoyé d’Allah! Je suis sortie et Omar m’a dit telle et telle chose”. Elle (Aïcha) ajouta: “Aussitôt, il reçut la révélation (de la sourate Al -‘Ahzâb, verset 59), puis revint à son calme — pendant tout ce temps le morceau de gigot était encore dans ses mains – et dit: Allah vous a autorisé à sortir pour satisfaire votre besoin naturel. (Hadith 4034 dans le Sahîh de Muslim)

L’impôt révolutionnaire, la zakat (à ne pas confondre avec la saddaquat qui est l’aumône), est dédié à la croissance de la secte. C’est la première source de richesse pour Mahomet. Toute tribu vaincue doit acquitter la zakat si elle veut survivre. L’argent a une importance inouïe en islam ; le dépenser au lieu de le mettre dans les caisses de la secte est un péché malin : « car les gaspilleurs sont les frères des diables ; et le Diable est très ingrat envers son Seigneur. » (17:27)

Mahomet, ce “saint” homme, a naturellement la haute main sur le butin : « Ils t’interrogent au sujet du butin. Dis : “Le butin est à Allah et à Son messager.”

Craignez Allah, maintenez la concorde entre vous et obéissez à Allah et à Son messager, si vous êtes croyants. » (8:1)

A une autre époque, Mahomet ne réclamait qu’un cinquième du butin… « Et sachez que, de tout butin que vous avez ramassé, le cinquième appartient à Allah, au messager, à ses proches parents, aux orphelins, aux pauvres, et aux voyageurs (en détresse), si vous croyez en Allah et en ce que Nous avons fait descendre sur Notre serviteur, le jour du Discernement : le jour où les deux groupes s’étaient rencontrés, et Allah est Omnipotent ). » (8:41)

SUITE: http://mahomet.centerblog.net/

Leave a comment

Filed under Articles, Islam, video

Comedy Central crée la polémique avec son dessin animé "Jésus-Christ"

Jésus dans South Park

Comedy Central a annoncé qu’elle lançait une série de dessins animés intitulée JC. Des épisodes d’une demi-heure dont le héros est un type nommé Christ, Jésus de son prénom, et qui veut échapper à l’ombre un peu pesante de son père (Dieu pour les intimes). Dieu y est un personnage «apathique» qui préfère jouer aux jeux vidéo plutôt que d’écouter son fils.Dans les derniers épisodes de South Park, Jésus avait fait meilleur figure que son ami Mahomet, qui se cachait derrière une bande «censuré», ou dans la peau d’un ours en peluche (la religion musulmanne proscrit sa figuration). Des groupes extrémistes s’étaient insurgés de cette représentation, menaçant les auteurs du dessin animé. Quant à savoir si JC pourrait susciter un mécontentement de la part des Chrétiens, «il est bien trop tôt pour le dire» a souligné Kent Alterman, un responsable de la programmation de Comedy Central. JC. est encore dans les cartons, avec 21 autres projets en cours.

voir l’article sur 20mn.fr

Leave a comment

Filed under Articles

200th South Park episode featuring Mohammed, the prophet of Islam

.

It’s some excerpts from the 200th episode of South Park, which has just gone out. (The YouTube account shows it in mirror image, for some reason.) In it, the league of “super best friends” – that is the founders of all the world’s major religions – appear again. With one exception: Mohammed, who is not allowed to be seen. “The world has changed”, Jesus tells the kids. But the nature of Mo’s superpower soon becomes clear and a group of celebrities, including Tom Cruise, decide that they want it too. And what is the special power? That no one is allowed to criticise him.

Here is another video where South Park co-creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker speak with Boing Boing’s Xeni Jardin about the 200th episode of the hit Comedy Central series, and plans to revisit battles over the boundaries of what can and cannot be done on television — including how many celebrities they can piss off in a single episode, and whether Comedy Central will stop them from showing the image and voice of a cartoon version of the Muslim prophet Mohammed.

Leave a comment

Filed under A VRAI DIRE IN ENGLISH, Islamvideo, Video in English

Is the Koran in Favor of having Pre-Puberty Wives?

The argument is yes based on SURA 65:4.SURA 65 is called AL-TALAQ(the divorce).It begins as 65:1:”Oh prophet,when you DIVORCE women divorce them at the prescribed period and count the period.”

SURA 65:4:
“And for such of your women as:
1. DESPAIR of MENSTRUATION(NOTE:have MENOPAUSE), IF YOU have DOUBT, their period (of waiting) will be 3 MONTHS.
2.And with THOSE who have NOT menstruated.
3.And for those who are PREGNANT, their period (NOTE:of wait till the DIVORCE)will be till they give birth.”

SO?

If the husband DOUBTS the MENOPAUSE wife is really in menopause,wait 3 MONTHS.Why?To see if her stomach get big due to PREGNANCY.
If he doubts the wife does not menstruate(for a PREPUBESCENT wife,like 6,7,8 years of age),wait 3 MOTHS.To see if she is really NON-MENSTRUATING.
Here’s as it’s put by 3 MUSLIM translators(PICKTHAL was a British convert/plus YUSUFALI,SHAKIR):

http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/065.qmt.html

NOTE:there are arguments against this interpretation but they can’t prove 100% sura 65:4 does NOT apply to PRE-PUBERTY wives.More to come.

DID CHRISTIANS COPY THE RESURRECTION FROM THE EGYPTIAN GOD OSIRIS?

MARY JO SHARP is a very intelligent Christian who answers such questions in her blog:
http://confidentchristianity.com/

Here is the well-written answer:
http://confidentchristianity.com/articles/Resurrection_Myths2-Osiris.html

3 Comments

Filed under A VRAI DIRE IN ENGLISH, Articles in English, Islam articles

Muhammad found in Taurat & Injeel’? Great claims demand great evidence!

 

S:7v157. “Those who follow the Apostle,
The unlettered Prophet,
Whom they find mentioned
In their own (Scriptures),—
In the Law and the Gospel;—

S:61v6. And remember, Jesus,
The son of Mary, said:
“O Children of Israel!
I am the apostle of God
(Sent) to you, confirming
The Law (which came)
Before me, and giving
Glad Tidings of an Apostle
To come after me,
Whose name shall be Aḥmad.”

These are two quotes from the Quran which Islam claims as proof that there are predictions in the Holy Bible fore-telling the coming of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
Let us examine these. But first a further quote from sura 7v186;’ Those whom Allah sendeth astray, there is no guide for them. He leaveth them to wander blindly on in their contumacy’ (stubborn disobedience).

In the Holy Bible, St.John chapters 14,15,16, Jesus tells His disciples that after He left, He would ’send the Spirit of Truth’, ‘Whom the world cannot receive’, ‘Who would dwell in you’ and ‘be with you forever.’ He is called Another Comforter, the Holy Ghost or the Holy Spirit, Who can be blasphemed (Matthew 12v31). Does this sound like a man?
Islam will claim Muhammad was indeed ‘the Holy Ghost’! We would ask, how can a man be a Ghost!?
In the Pickthall ‘Explanatory Translation’, S:61v6 reads;
‘And when Jesus son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is the Praised One(2).Yet when he hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic’.
In footnote no’2, as regarding the ‘praised one’, we read; “Ahmad, a name of the prophet of Arabia. The promised ‘Comforter’ was believed by many Christian communities of the east to be a prophet yet to come, and most of them accepted Muhammad as that prophet.”
This ,of course is Islamic propaganda and can not be proven. However, it is quite clear that Pickthall and Islam hold to this claim that Muhammad was ‘the Comforter’, the ‘Holy Ghost’.
But when reading the Quran we see a striking thing. In footnote 3 when commenting on S:2v87 as regards the identity of the Holy Spirit, Pickthall, one of the most reputable translators of the Quran, if you read the introduction, states; “The Holy Spirit’ is a term for the angel of revelation, Gabriel (on whom be peace)!!! So, was Muhammad the angel Gabriel? It does not say ‘a Holy Ghost’, but ‘The Holy Ghost’. What a confusion! To say he was not the angel Gabriel would be to deny what the Quran says,but to insist Muhammad was “the Comforter”, “the Holy Ghost”, “the Holy Spirit” is absurd and confusing. How can a man be the angel who supposedly brought the Quran to him!!!?
But there’s more. In sura 19 and sura 66, we read about the miraculous birth of Jesus. The Quran says that it was by the Holy Spirit that Jesus was put into Miriam’s womb. Are we to understand that “the Comforter”, “the Holy Spirit”, Muhammad (as Islam insists) was the father of Jesus!!! This is the logical conclusion one comes to when taking all these accounts into consideration.

S:18v57;Verily We
Have set veils over their hearts
Lest they should understand this,
and over their ears, deafness.
If thou callest them
To guidance, even then
Will they never accept guidance.

S:35v8; Is he, the evil of whose deeds is made fairseeming unto him so that he deemeth it good, (other than Satan’s dupe) ? Allah verily sendeth whom He will astray, and guideth whom He will;
Muslims must accept the god they worship will mislead them if allah so wishes to. We however, will accept what the Holy Bible says about God, that He is not the author of confusion. He is long-suffering and patient towards us, not willing for any to perish but that all should come to the knowledge of Truth and repent believing in the Lord Jesus unto everlasting life.

S:28v15;He said:.. “This is a work
Of Evil (Satan): for he is
An enemy that manifestly
Misleads!”

1 Comment

Filed under A VRAI DIRE IN ENGLISH, Articles in English, Islam articles

Why Mohammed is a False Prophet According to Judaism

The argument is simple.According to Judaism if somebody says he is a prophet and says something that goes AGAINST Judaism then he is a FALSE prophet.Simple.

But first of all

Here is the part Muslims say refers to Mohammed:

Deutoronomy 18:17-19:

“The LORD said to me: “What they say is good.I will raise up for them a PROPHET like YOU(Moses) from among THEIR BROTHERS(Note:the Jews); I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him.If anyone does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name, I myself will call him to account.”

So?

Muslims say the word BROTHERS means ARABS since in Hebrew the word can mean RELATIVES and Jews and Arabs both descend from Abraham.There are arguments against this but taking the MINIMALIST position EVEN IF “brothers” means “Arabs”,according to Judaism,Mohammed was still a FALSE prophet.

Why?

The words that immediately follow are,Deuteronomy 18:20:

“But a PROPHET who presumes to speak in my name ANYTHING I have NOT commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, must be put to death.”

In other words he is a fake.

Kissing the Black Stone

Mohammed approved as part of the religion of Islam the making of a pilgrimage to Mecca called the HAJ.It is a RELIGIOUS ceremony in honor of Allah where the people had to KISS a BLACK STONE.Remember,it’s part of a religious ritual where pilgrims go around the black stone(in honor of Allah) seven times.Verify:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haj

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Stone

It is Idolatry

Ask any rabbi and he will tell you that according to Jewish thinking such an action is idolatry.Since Mohammed approved of it he was no prophet.

What the Koran says

It disapproves of having/using a stone in an symbolical sense,so it appears to contradict Mohammed’s action:

Sura 5:90:

“O you who believe! Intoxicants and gambling,stones, and (divination by) arrows, are an abomination,of Satan’s handwork:leave it, that you may prosper.”

http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/005.qmt.html

Whatever the case,what Mohammed did proves,for a Jew,that he was no prophet.

A good suggestion

Mary Jo SHARP,is a brilliant debater in defense of Christianity.She has had only 2 debates,both with Muslims.Her website is:

http://confidentchristianity.com/

Here is her debate with Tabassum Hussain,of the “Muslim Debate Initiative” on “Women in the Bible and Quran”:

 

Leave a comment

Filed under A VRAI DIRE IN ENGLISH, Articles in English, Islam articles

Is Muhammad in Isaiah?

MOHAMMED PROPHESIZED IN ISAIAH 23:13-17?

Muslims say here Mohammed is prophesized. I agree with them that it has to do with ARABIA, it mentions KEDAR,who was a son of ISHMAEL,son of ABRAHAM.Now here the mention of Kedar MEANS ONLY a person,since there is NO town or city in Arabia called Kedar.We know TEMA was a DESCENDANT of Ishamel,in fact there is even a TOWN named Tema and the REGION is called Tema.

Isaiah 21:13-17:

” Oracle on ARABIA: In the thicket in the nomad country spend the night, O caravans of Dedanites. Meet the thirsty, bring them water; you who dwell in the LAND of TEMA, greet the fugitives with bread.

They FLEE from the sword, from the whetted sword; From the taut bow, from the fury of battle. For thus says the Lord to me: In another year, like those of a hireling, all the glory of KEDAR will come to an end. Few of Kedar’s stalwart archers will remain, for the LORD, the God of Israel, has spoken. ”

What does Tema mean?

We have the following information:

“Baker Encyclopedia of Bible Places:
Towns & Cities, Countries & States, Archaeology & Topography
Consulting Editor John J. Bimson, © Inter-Varsity Press, 1995
Published in the USA by Baker Books. ISBN 0-85110-657-9, pp. 296-7:

“TEMA.

The name (Hebrew tema’):

1.Of the son and descendants of Ishmael (Genesis 25:15; 1 Chronicles 1:30)

2.And of the district they inhabited (Job 6:19). It is mentioned, with Dedan and Buz, as a remote place (Jeremiah 25:23) and as an oasis in the desert on a main trade route through Arabia (Isaiah 21:14).

The modern site is Taima‘, about 400 kilometres north-north-west of Medina in north-western Arabia. It became an urban centre around 600 BC and excavations show that it reached its peak of prosperity in the 5th century BC. Several Aramaic inscriptions date from this period. ”

Why it can’t be about Muhammad

Mohammed first preached in MECCA for 10 years and then he had to flee to MEDINA. ISAIAH 21 can not refer to Mohammed fleeing from Mecca to Medina because at that time there was a town called Tema and the prophecy mentions the fugitives going to TEMA,NOT to MEDINA.Mohamme went to MEDINA,not Tema.

Land of Tema=Arabia?

The phrase “Land of Tema” can’t mean “Arabia” because it would mean Mohammed fled from MECCA to ARABIA?

That would be like someone saying ” I fled from NEW YORK to the UNITED STATES”. It means the city and area of Tema,and not Medina.

Another Reason why it is not Muhammad

Isaiah 21:13-17:

” Oracle on ARABIA: In the thicket in the nomad country spend the night, O caravans of Dedanites. Meet the thirsty, bring them water; you who dwell in the LAND of TEMA, greet the FUGITIVES ( NOTE:MOHAMMED and his group that fled from Mecca to Medina? ) with bread.

They FLEE ( NOTE: MOHAMMED fleeing from Mecca in 622 AD?) from the SWORD, from the whetted SWORD (NOTE:MOHAMMED fleeing from Mecca for his life?); From the taut bow, from the fury of battle. For thus says the Lord to me: In ANOTHER YEAR, like those of a hireling, all the glory of KEDAR ( NOTE: all the glory of the Arabs of MECCA?) will COME to an END. Few of Kedar’s stalwart archers will remain, for the LORD, the God of Israel, has spoken. ”

The Reason why it can’t be Muhammad

Mohammed fled:

1.With his followers from Mecca to Medina in 622.

2.And two years later,not one year later, there was a battle between the Meccans and Muslims called the Battle of BADR, in 624.

3.So the idea that ISAIAH 21 applied to Mohammed is not true because to say that ” the glory of Kedar ( where Kedar would represent the Arabs of Mecca) will COME to an END” is false because notice the Battle of Badr took place TWO YEARS after the flight of Mohammed. But Isaiah 21 says “in another year”.

If you go to BIBLEGATEWAY.COM and you go to Isaiah 21 and choose YOUNG’S LITERAL translation you will see that in the original Hebrew it is ” WITHIN a year”.So it can not apply to Muhammad.

2 Comments

Filed under A VRAI DIRE IN ENGLISH, Articles in English, Islam articles